FirePro S7000 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against Qualcomm Adreno 680, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S7000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
| Code name | Pitcairn | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 6 December 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |