FirePro V5800 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Qualcomm Adreno 680, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | |
| Code name | Juniper | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 6 December 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Check Price |