FirePro W8000 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
In this comparison between FirePro W8000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8000 will be the best choice, for others Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8000
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
FirePro W8000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
1−2
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
low / 768p
220−230
60−65
medium / 768p
190−200
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
7−8
QHD / 1440p
65−70
−
4K / 2160p
35−40
−
high / 768p
150−160
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
FirePro W8000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
45−50
medium / 768p
100−110
10−11
ultra / 1080p
70−75
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
21−24
medium / 1080p
60−65
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
30−33
0−1
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
0−1
low / 768p
95−100
18−20
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
35−40
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
65−70
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
low / 768p
65−70
0−1
medium / 768p
40−45
−
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
high / 768p
55−60
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
Full Specs
FirePro W8000
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Code name
Tahiti
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
14 June 2012
6 December 2018
Pipelines
1792
Core clock speed
900 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
176 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
391 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
