FireStream 9370 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Qualcomm Adreno 680. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Qualcomm Adreno 680. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | |
Code name | Cypress | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 6 December 2018 |
Pipelines | 1600 | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GRID K140Q
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 720A
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GRID K140Q
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce 720A