GeForce GTX 950A vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
When comparing GeForce GTX 950A and Qualcomm Adreno 680, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Qualcomm Adreno 680 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 950A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 396% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 220% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 295% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 36% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | |
Code name | GM107 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 6 December 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID K140Q
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce 720A
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GRID K140Q
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce 720A