GRID K280Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K280Q and Qualcomm Adreno 680. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K280Q and Qualcomm Adreno 680. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K280Q
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 220% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 295% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | |
| Code name | GK104 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 6 December 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |