GRID M10 8Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Qualcomm Adreno 680, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Qualcomm Adreno 680 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | |
| Code name | GM107 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 6 December 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Check Price |