Quadro M600M vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

In this comparison between Quadro M600M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M600M will be the best choice, for others Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro M600M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro M600M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M or Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro M600M Qualcomm Adreno 680
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
  • Quadro M600M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 10−11 0−1
ultra / 1080p 6−7
QHD / 1440p 1−2 0−1
low / 720p 21−24 1−2
medium / 1080p 12−14 0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.

Full Specs

  Quadro M600M Qualcomm Adreno 680
Architecture Maxwell
Code name GM107
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Release date 2 October 2015 6 December 2018
Pipelines 384
Core clock speed 837 MHz
Boost Clock 876 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 7 nm
Texture fill rate 14.02
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s
Shared memory - +
DirectX 12 DirectX 12
Shader Model 5.0
OpenGL 4.5
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 5.0
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
  Check Price Check Price