Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

In this comparison between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:

Main Specs

  Qualcomm Adreno 680 Radeon Pro WX 5100
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Qualcomm Adreno 680 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
  • Qualcomm Adreno 680 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 35−40
ultra / 1080p 21−24
QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 1−2 60−65
medium / 1080p 0−1 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.

Full Specs

  Qualcomm Adreno 680 Radeon Pro WX 5100
Architecture GCN 4.0
Code name Ellesmere
Type Laptop Workstation
Release date 6 December 2018 18 November 2016
Pipelines 1792
Core clock speed 713 MHz
Boost Clock 1086 MHz
Transistor count 5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 121.6
Floating-point performance 3,892 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s
Shared memory +
DirectX DirectX 12 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 6.4
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 2.0
Vulkan 1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 250 Mh/s
  Check Price