Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
When choosing between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
| Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
| Check Price |
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
Full Specs
| Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
| Architecture | GCN | |
| Code name | Kaveri Spectre | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 December 2018 | 14 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GRID K140Q
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GRID K140Q
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce 720A
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon HD 4890
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX