Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
In this comparison between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri | |
Check Price |
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. |
Full Specs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | GCN | |
Code name | Kaveri Spectre | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 December 2018 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Shared memory | + | + |
DirectX | DirectX 12 | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GRID K140Q
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs GRID K140Q
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce 720A
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU