Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. |
Full Specs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
Code name | Opal | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 December 2018 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GRID K140Q
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GRID K140Q
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce 720A
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics