Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000

In this comparison between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 or Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:

Main Specs

  Qualcomm Adreno 680 Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
  Check Price Check Price
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • Qualcomm Adreno 680 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 10−11
ultra / 1080p 6−7
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 1−2 21−24
medium / 1080p 0−1 12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.

Full Specs

  Qualcomm Adreno 680 Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
Architecture Vega
Code name Vega Raven Ridge
Type Laptop Laptop
Release date 6 December 2018 7 January 2018
Pipelines 384
Boost Clock 1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 14 nm
Shared memory + -
DirectX DirectX 12 DirectX 12_1
  Check Price Check Price