FireStream 9270 vs Radeon 520
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon 520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Radeon 520.
FireStream 9270
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon 520 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 280 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1350 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 90% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | Oland |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| Check Price |