FireStream 9370 vs Radeon 520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Radeon 520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon 520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 205 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2350 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 270% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Cypress | Oland |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| Check Price |