GRID K160Q vs Radeon 520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon 520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon 520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 160% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 180 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 468 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |