Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon 520
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 520.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon 520 has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 830 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
1−2
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
55−60
medium / 768p
130−140
30−33
ultra / 1080p
65−70
6−7
QHD / 1440p
35−40
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
100−110
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
10−11
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
low / 768p
60−65
18−20
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
high / 1080p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 90% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
40−45
10−11
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 200% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
30−35
0−1
medium / 768p
21−24
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
high / 768p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon 520.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon 520
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
GCN 1.0
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Oland
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
21 March 2017
Pipelines
40
320
Core clock speed
200 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
20.60
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
659.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12.0
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
+
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price