P106 100 vs Radeon 520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between P106 100 and Radeon 520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the P106 100 stacks up against Radeon 520, check out specs charts below.
P106 100
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
P106 100 | Radeon 520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 140% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P106 100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- P106 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 476 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 5758 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
P106 100 and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
P106 100 and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 520% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
P106 100 | Radeon 520 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Oland |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 19 June 2017 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Check Price |