Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon 520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon 520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon 520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 430 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 650 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Check Price |