Quadro M4000M vs Radeon 520
In this comparison between Quadro M4000M and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon 520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M4000M and Radeon 520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M or Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M
Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 55 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 2762 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
0−1
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
1−2
medium / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
0−1
medium / 1080p
60−65
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M4000M and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
55−60
medium / 768p
220−230
30−33
ultra / 1080p
180−190
6−7
QHD / 1440p
110−120
−
4K / 2160p
70−75
−
high / 768p
210−220
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
Quadro M4000M and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
110−120
10−11
ultra / 1080p
100−110
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
45−50
−
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
80−85
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
21−24
medium / 1080p
110−120
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
60−65
0−1
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
0−1
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
0−1
medium / 1080p
65−70
0−1
low / 768p
140−150
18−20
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
0−1
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
−
low / 768p
130−140
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
100−110
10−11
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 520% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
low / 768p
130−140
0−1
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
45−50
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
50−55
0−1
high / 768p
60−65
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon 520.
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M
Radeon 520
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Code name
GM204
Oland
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
21 March 2017
Pipelines
1,280
320
Core clock speed
975 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
78.00
20.60
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
659.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
16 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12.0
Shader Model
5.0
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price