Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 M350
When choosing between Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 M350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 M350.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 520 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon 520 has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- Radeon 520 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 M350 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 305 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 1250 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 520 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Opal |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |