GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon 540
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon 540. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon 540. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon 540
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 20% more power consumption, than Radeon 540.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 540 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon 540 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon 540 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon 540.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 287% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | − | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon 540 | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N10E-GS1 | Lexa |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 26 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 64 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 35.97 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 56 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |