Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon 540
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 540, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Radeon 540, check out specs charts below.
Radeon 540
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon 540 has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon 540.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon 540 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon 540 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 540 is 900 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon 540 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | Lexa |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 26 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 35.97 |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 56 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |