Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon 540
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon 540
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon 540 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon 540 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 540 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 253% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 47% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 165% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 206% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 246% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon 540. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon 540 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Lexa |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 26 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 96 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |