Radeon 540 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between Radeon 540 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon 540 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon 540
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 540 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon 540 has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon 540 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon 540 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon 540 is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Radeon 540 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon 540 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 540 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Lexa | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 March 2019 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 35.97 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |