FirePro W7100 vs Radeon 540X
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon 540X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and Radeon 540X.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon 540X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 540X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 540X here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon 540X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 700% more power consumption, than Radeon 540X.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 540X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon 540X.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 540X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon 540X - with GCN 4.0.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 540X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540X is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 292% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon 540X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon 540X | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Lexa |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 12 August 2019 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 33.47 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |