GRID K240Q vs Radeon 540X
When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon 540X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon 540X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Radeon 540X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 540X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 540X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon 540X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 540X.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 540X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 540X has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon 540X - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 540X - with GCN 4.0.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 540X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540X is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Radeon 540X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 44% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 53% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon 540X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Lexa |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 33.47 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |