Radeon 540X vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon 540X and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon 540X and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
Radeon 540X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 540X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 540X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 540X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon 540X.
- Radeon 540X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon 540X.
- Radeon 540X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon 540X is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon 540X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540X is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 540X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Lexa | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.47 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Check Price |