Quadro K2000M vs Radeon 550X
When choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon 550X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000M and Radeon 550X.
Radeon 550X
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon 550X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon 550X.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon 550X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon 550X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 550X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 550X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 550X is 337 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 550X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 550X is 5200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon 550X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 550X in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon 550X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Lexa |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 27 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 38.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |