Radeon 550X vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon 550X
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 550X | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon 550X has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon 550X is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon 550X is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 550X is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 1% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Radeon 550X and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 550X | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Lexa | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 March 2019 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |