GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon 630

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Radeon 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Radeon 630 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon 630 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon 630 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon 630 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Radeon 630 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon 630
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M has 20% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon 630 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon 630 - with GCN 1.0.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	14−16
medium / 1080p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	60−65	120−130
medium / 768p	27−30	100−110
ultra / 1080p	7−8	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
high / 768p	16−18	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 214% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	45−50	75−80
medium / 768p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	0−1	10−11
low / 768p	18−20	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	8−9
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 287% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	8−9
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
low / 768p	0−1	18−20
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	14−16	40−45
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
high / 768p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon 630
Architecture	G9x	GCN 1.0
Code name	N10E-GS1	Lexa
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009	12 August 2019
Pipelines	64	512
Core clock speed	1500 MHz
Boost Clock		1219 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	192 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed		6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
Shader Model	4.0
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon 630

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon 630 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares