GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon 630
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 630, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 630 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 630 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 630 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon 630.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 630 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon 630 - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 5001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 630 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 630 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon 630 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon 630 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Lexa |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |