GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon 630
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon 630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon 630.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 630 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 630 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 630 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon 630 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon 630 - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 4300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 47% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon 630 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | Lexa |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |