GRID K280Q vs Radeon 630
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Radeon 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 630 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 630 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon 630 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon 630 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 630 - with GCN 1.0.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon 630 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 127% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon 630 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Lexa |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |