Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro M3000M vs Radeon 630

    In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Radeon 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro M3000M Check Price
    Radeon 630 Check Price

    Quadro M3000M and Radeon 630 are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro M3000M and Radeon 630 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M or Radeon 630 here:

    Quadro M3000M Laptops
    Radeon 630 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro M3000M Radeon 630
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M3000M has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
    • Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
    • Quadro M3000M and Radeon 630 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 630 - in Laptops.
    • Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 630 - with GCN 1.0.
    • Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 35−40 3−4
    ultra / 1080p 21−24 1−2
    QHD / 1440p 16−18 0−1
    4K / 2160p 10−11 −
    low / 720p 60−65 14−16
    medium / 1080p 40−45 6−7
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon 630.

    Full Specs

      Quadro M3000M Radeon 630
    Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.0
    Code name GM204 Lexa
    Type Mobile workstation Laptop
    Release date 2 October 2015 12 August 2019
    Pipelines 1,024 512
    Core clock speed 1050 MHz
    Boost Clock 1219 MHz
    Transistor count 5,200 million 2,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
    Texture fill rate 67.20
    Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 6000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
    Shader Model 5.0
    OpenGL 4.5 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 +
    CUDA 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares