FirePro M7740 vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro M7740 and Radeon E6760 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- FirePro M7740 and Radeon E6760 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 2200 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M7740 and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | RV740 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |