GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon E6760
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 233% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon E6760 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon E6760 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF104 | Turks |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |