GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon E6760
When comparing GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Radeon E6760, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Radeon E6760 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E6760
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M SLI is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Radeon E6760 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 1950 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N11E-GS | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 14.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |