GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon E6760
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon E6760, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon E6760.
Radeon E6760
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760M has 22% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 57 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N14E-GL | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |