GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon E6760
When choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon E6760, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon E6760.
Radeon E6760
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 344 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |