GeForce MX110 vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between GeForce MX110 and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX110 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX110 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- GeForce MX110 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX110 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 365 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce MX110 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX110 and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX110 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N16V-GMR1 | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |