Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon E6760
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon E6760, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon E6760 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E6760
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon E6760 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon E6760 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 2 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon E6760 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon E6760 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro FX 4800
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
- Radeon E6760 vs Quadro FX 4800
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 M270DX