Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon E6760
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E6760, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E6760 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E6760
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon E6760 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon E6760 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 2 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |