Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon E6760 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon E6760 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 2 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |