Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon E6760
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon E6760, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU stacks up against Radeon E6760, check out specs charts below.
Radeon E6760
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon E6760 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon E6760 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 2 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.0 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Radeon E6760 vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Radeon E6760 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Quadro FX 4800
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R7 M270DX
- Radeon E6760 vs Quadro FX 4800
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 M270DX