Quadro M4000M vs Radeon E6760
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M4000M and Radeon E6760. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon E6760. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon E6760
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 122% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M4000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 375 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1812 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M4000M and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM204 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |