Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between Radeon E6760 and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon E6760 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Radeon E6760 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 455% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- Radeon E6760 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Radeon E6760 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Radeon E6760 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 123 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- Radeon E6760 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 1950 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 550% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon E6760 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 300% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
Radeon E6760 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Turks | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 2 May 2011 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 480 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |