GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon E8860
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon E8860, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon E8860.
Radeon E8860
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 305% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon E8860 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280M SLI is 10 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon E8860 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 3550 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |