Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon E8860
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E8860, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E8860 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E8860
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon E8860 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 37 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 has 146% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E8860 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon E8860 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 25 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |