Quadro K4000M vs Radeon E8860
In this comparison between Quadro K4000M and Radeon E8860 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon E8860 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M | Radeon E8860 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 37 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 170% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K4000M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 1700 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K4000M and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 32% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M | Radeon E8860 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14E-Q3 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 25 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 960 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |